http://www.yetanothertechblog.com/2009/03/23/survey-for-ubiquity-localization/ Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:31:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.yetanothertechblog.com/2009/03/23/survey-for-ubiquity-localization/comment-page-1/#comment-2289 flod Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:44:43 +0000 http://www.yetanothertechblog.com/?p=37#comment-2289 Marco, <a href="http://www.yetanothertechblog.com/2009/03/08/thinking-ubiquity-in-italian/#comment-2153">here's your answer</a>. If you want to integrate Ubiquity in the browser's interface, you MUST localize it. If you don't, it's just another tool for geeks ;-) Marco, here’s your answer. If you want to integrate Ubiquity in the browser’s interface, you MUST localize it. If you don’t, it’s just another tool for geeks

]]> http://www.yetanothertechblog.com/2009/03/23/survey-for-ubiquity-localization/comment-page-1/#comment-2282 Marco Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:39:03 +0000 http://www.yetanothertechblog.com/?p=37#comment-2282 uuuh makes me wonder .. -- joke. leaving the comment here would make me sound some kinda jerk, but the lame question of the day could be: why localizing? if it has to ba a console, shouldn't it be left as is, so to make the entire environment easier to access? DOS has no translation, anyway, niether has bash. uuuh makes me wonder .. — joke.
leaving the comment here would make me sound some kinda jerk, but the lame question of the day could be: why localizing? if it has to ba a console, shouldn’t it be left as is, so to make the entire environment easier to access? DOS has no translation, anyway, niether has bash.

]]>